May 28th, 2010
Textbook Travesty: How Texas Is Taking the Rest of Us with Them and Who They Cut from the Curriculum
Sometimes it’s difficult to judge which bits of news are genuinely important. I’d noted a few headlines going by about Texas’ new textbook curriculum, and I decided that, while it was most certainly disheartening, it was happening in Texas, so it wasn’t a top concern for me. The topic came up the other night while I was having dinner with my parents, which was when my mother reminded me that Texas is one of the two largest textbook markets in the country, the other being California. Now, I’m a big fan of the free market, and I understand that to make money, companies make products with their biggest markets in mind. That said, the idea that this new legislation in Texas could very easily–not to mention rapidly–make its way to schools in my home town, well, that idea is downright frightening. I have nothing against Texas doing stuff like this within the confines of their own state, but there’s a reason that I wouldn’t want to live there–I don’t think we’d get along.
I started looking into the matter a bit more closely. I found some assessments of the situation that make the excitement over the matter sound ridiculous, like a bunch of loud, liberal nonsense. I found others that made it sound like the end of all freedom and proper, public education was right around the corner. Reading the articles on both sides closely, it seemed like those for the change were leaving a lot out and using deceptive language that had that special going-to-come-back-and-bite-you ring to it, and those against it were doing an awful lot of speculation. I wanted the real story, so I started looking through some of the changes being made (freely available, though not entirely up to date, on the Texas Education Agency website).
Left Out of History: Who’s Getting Cut from Texas’ New Textbooks?
Going through this list, I found 33 names that will be removed from the annals of history in social studies textbooks. Let’s take a look:
- Henrietta King. Rancher and philanthropist, she moved to Texas, got married, ran the housing and education facilities for Mexican-American ranch hands until the Civil War, and is best known for successfully bringing King Ranch out of its post-war debt and into the national spotlight for cattle and horse breeding. Apparently, our children can’t learn about a successful business women who supported immigrant workers. That kind of role model could be dangerous. She was cut from second-grade books.
- Florence Nightingale. This famous nurse is being cut from second-grade textbooks as well. Considered the founder of professional nursing as a field, she had some strong feelings about the place of women in Victorian England, specifically about women being forced into an overly feminine, helpless role in society. A piece of her writings, Cassandra, has been hailed as “a major text of English feminism, a link between Wollstonecraft and Woolf.” Certainly can’t have our girls looking to someone like this for inspiration or hero worship.
- Dolores Huerta. Co-founder of the United Farm Workers of America and a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, she’s been cut from third-grade books. Way to dodge that tricky subject, Texas; that’ll fool the kids for sure.
- Paul Bunyan. This legendarily over-sized lumberjack supposedly created the Grand Canyon by dragging his axe behind him after a long day of felling trees and frolicking with Babe, his blue ox. Why he’s getting cut is beyond me–I doubt it’s because he’s too eco-friendly; dude could’ve clear-cut Alaska in no time flat.
- Robinson Crusoe. Another one that baffles me, Robinson Crusoe is the hero of the eponymous novel written by Daniel Dafoe. Maybe it’s because ol’ Crusoe was stranded near those pinkos the Venezuelans? Maybe they don’t want third-graders thinking about disobeying their parents’ wishes to go chase their sea-faring dreams? Who knows.
- Louis Daguerre. Okay, so kids probably don’t need to learn about the daguerreotype process anymore because we’re all using digital. Besides, this artist, photographer, and inventor was French, and I think a few idiots are still dreadfully upset at the French for not coming to help us wage an illegitimate war in Iraq.
Let’s call this part one. Tune in next week for the stunning conclusion of this discussion about this underhanded manipulation of the very educational foundation of an entire generation. Also in Monday’s post, we’ll discuss irony and how it is a) not a black fly in your chardonnay, and b) probably something a lot closer to the country’s loudest proponents of personal civil liberties engaging in censorship.
